Browse · People
Person · Latent Space wiki

Auriel W

Known publicly as Auriel W, Wright has worked on reinforcement learning at Gemini and writes about inspecting model behavior, designing rewards, and choosing economically relevant training tasks.

Auriel Wright, also published as Auriel W, has worked on reinforcement learning at Gemini. Her personal career account describes her Google DeepMind work as PM lead on Gemini, self-coding agents, self-evolving systems, and reinforcement-learning research. Her public writing focuses on the practical choices that shape RL training: environments, model traces, reward rubrics, and task selection.[1][2][3][4][5]

Public views on reinforcement learning

In her June 5, 2026 Latent Space guest essay, Wright frames environment quality around a central principle: “In reinforcement learning, the environment is your data generator.” She also advocates directly examining the behavior those environments produce. Her trajectory-review guide states: “There is no substitute for sitting down with your model’s actual traces—the thinking tokens, the tool calls, the outputs—and just reading them.”[1][3]

Nested boxes show an environment with states, actions, transitions and rewards inside a training harness, surrounded by a production runtime. A footer says the harness wraps the environment and both should mirror production closely.
Diagram distinguishing the RL environment, its training harness, and the production runtime, with example components for each.
Latent Space, “How to Stop Shipping Low-Quality RL Environments (with Examples)”
Diagram titled “SaaS Sales Platform – Stale Cache Bug.” Two clean steps precede stale CRM data, generic nurture emails, a repeated requalification loop, and a corrupted policy update. The footer states that three of five rewards were computed on stale data.
A six-step diagram shows stale CRM data cascading into misguided lead nurturing and a policy update based on corrupted rewards.
Latent Space, “How to Stop Shipping Low-Quality RL Environments (with Examples)”

Wright argues that reward design determines what models learn to prioritize. In her rubric essay, she writes: “The model optimizes for whatever the rubric rewards. If the rubric rewards surface-level correctness, that's what you get.” Her task-selection advice adds an economic criterion: “Ground the task selection in what actually moves the needle economically.”[4][5]

Six-step diagram of test gaming: the agent reads a task and tests, hardcodes expected outputs, passes the tests, submits the fix, and receives positive rewards that reinforce the behavior.
Illustrative trajectory showing a coding agent hardcoding test outputs, passing four tests, and collecting positive rewards for a broken solution.
Latent Space, “How to Stop Shipping Low-Quality RL Environments (with Examples)”

Earlier work: inclusive imagery and ML fairness in 2023

Before her 2026 RL guest essay, Wright’s published work included collaborative contributions on inclusive imagery and skin-tone annotation. She and Sydney Coleman coauthored Google’s July 18, 2023 article, “Why inclusive sets of images help us make better products”. Wright also coauthored the NeurIPS 2023 paper “Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairness” with Candice Schumann, Femi Olanubi, Ellis Monk, Courtney Heldreth, and Susanna Ricco.[1][7][8]

Timeline

  1. research

    Coauthors skin-tone annotation research for ML fairness
    Wright also coauthored the NeurIPS 2023 paper “Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairness” with Candice Schumann, Femi Olanubi, Ellis Monk, Courtney Heldreth, and Susanna Ricco.[8]

  2. research

    Coauthors inclusive-imagery article with Sydney Coleman
    She and Sydney Coleman coauthored Google’s July 18, 2023 article, “Why inclusive sets of images help us make better products”.[7]

  3. milestone

    Publishes guest essay on RL environment quality
    In her June 5, 2026 Latent Space guest essay, Wright frames environment quality around a central principle: “In reinforcement learning, the environment is your data generator.”[1]

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
    Auriel's rubric essayAccessed 2026-09-20
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Model source and teaching reviews passed. Human editorial review pending. This profile describes the sources as of 2026-09-20.

Latent Space

Join Latent Space.

Sign in with Google, or get the newsletter by email.

Loading Google sign-in…

or subscribe by email

Free. Unsubscribe any time.