Listen now (143 mins) | We summon all friends of the pod, and past and future guests including leaders from Nvidia, Zapier, HumanLoop, Weights and Biases, MultiOn, Guardrails, Bloop.ai, Julius AI to process what happened.
Out of curiosity, what’s the reasoning behind the claim that OpenAI choose to make GPTs and Assistants “intentionally underpowered”?
To me GPTs feels like another (more promising) attempt to productize their technology and democratize access - the same thinking that was behind the plugins (but that never really took of).
What it definitely doesn’t look or feel like is the next step on the stairway to AGI - but I’d love hear why I’m wrong for thinking that.
Out of curiosity, what’s the reasoning behind the claim that OpenAI choose to make GPTs and Assistants “intentionally underpowered”?
To me GPTs feels like another (more promising) attempt to productize their technology and democratize access - the same thinking that was behind the plugins (but that never really took of).
What it definitely doesn’t look or feel like is the next step on the stairway to AGI - but I’d love hear why I’m wrong for thinking that.
As for now, AGI is being incrementally approached by step-by-step changing interpretation of the AGI definition.